It’s often said that a lot of projects can be improved by taking away uncertainty. The common way to practice this is risk management. Currently a lot of frameworks & standards are at our disposition to deploy this, such as IS0 31000.
The feeling that more grip on the project (more certainty) is required typically arises from the ‘delusion of control’. Prior negative experiences do contribute to enforce this perception. And often risk management is seen as just not meeting up to the expectation of a ‘pro-active’ safeguarding management system for new, innovative products in development.
Risk management can not cover all risks nor none at all, it should be well dosed. Performing little or no risk management is clearly is not an option in the management of time, performance & budgets for innovation projects.
Between no risk management at all and a 100% certainty risk management, a tremendous increase in efforts & costs of risk management emerge. How is dosing possible ? And upto what extend ? An very appropriate threshold is the point when the gain equals (not exceeds) the pain. Risk management becomes very adequate when the difference between effectiveness of the risk measures and the costs of the management are equal.
By Frederik Wouters (Director Business Development, Verhaert)





